Was bombing Japan necessary?

And it wasn't necessary either. Militarily Japan was finished (as the Soviet invasion of Manchuria that August showed). Further blockade and urban destruction would have produced a surrender in August or September at the latest, without the need for the costly anticipated invasion or the atomic bomb.

Was the atomic bomb necessary for stopping the Japanese?

The atomic bomb was necessary to end the war with Japan at the earliest possible moment. By the early summer of 1945, Japanese leaders knew they could not win. But they fought on in hopes of securing better surrender terms.

Was the US justified in bombing Japan?

At the same time, only 29% of Japanese said the bombing was justified, while 64% thought it was unwarranted. But a 2015 Pew Research Center survey finds that the share of Americans who believe the use of nuclear weapons was justified is now 56%, with 34% saying it was not.

Was the second atomic bomb necessary?

Japan surrendered on August 15 and signed the surrender agreement three weeks after the Nagasaki bomb, ending almost a decade of global conflict that claimed some 73 million lives. But not everyone agrees that the bombs were necessary.

What would have happened if the US did not drop the atomic bomb?

The bombs brought a quick end to the war. Without the bombs, the war would have likely dragged on for at least another year, perhaps longer. The Allies' plan for Japan was called Operation Downfall and consisted of two parts, Operation Olympic and Operation Coronet.

Controversy over the decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan still lingers

Why was the atomic bomb not necessary?

Many historians have argued that the atomic bombing of Japan at the end of World War II was not necessary and unjustified. There have been several key reasons developed to support this position, such as: It was inhumane. It caused too much destruction.

Would Japan have surrendered without the atomic bombings?

However, the overwhelming historical evidence from American and Japanese archives indicates that Japan would have surrendered that August, even if atomic bombs had not been used — and documents prove that President Harry Truman and his closest advisers knew it.

Why was dropping the atomic bomb good?

It saved the lives of American soldiers. It potentially saved the lives of Japanese soldiers and civilians. It forced Japan to surrender, which it appeared unwilling to do. It was revenge for Japan's attack at Pearl Harbor.

Was Japan about to surrender before the atomic bomb?

Asked on August 17 by a New York Times reporter whether the atomic bomb caused Japan to surrender, Arnold said that “the Japanese position was hopeless even before the first atomic bomb fell, because the Japanese had lost control of their own air.”

Is Hiroshima still radioactive today?

Is there still radiation in Hiroshima and Nagasaki? The radiation in Hiroshima and Nagasaki today is on a par with the extremely low levels of background radiation (natural radioactivity) present anywhere on Earth. It has no effect on human bodies.

Was the dropping of the atomic bomb necessary essay?

The U.S was justified in dropping atomic bombs as it was an alternative to end the war at an instance and to also prevent the death rate of civilians. This was also necessary as it was America's desire to shorten the war if the Japanese surrendered.

Was the US justified in dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

Even if Hiroshima was necessary, the U.S. did not give enough time for word to filter out of its devastation before bombing Nagasaki. The bomb was used partly to justify the $2 billion spent on its development. The two cities were of limited military value. Civilians outnumbered troops in Hiroshima five or six to one.

What were the main arguments against dropping the atomic bomb on Japan?

Those who oppose the bombings argue it was militarily unnecessary, inherently immoral, a war crime, or a form of state terrorism. Critics believe a naval blockade and conventional bombings would have forced Japan to surrender unconditionally.

What were the pros and cons of dropping the atomic bomb?

The Pros and Cons of Bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki
  • PROS. ...
  • Pro #1: The bombs ended WWII. ...
  • Con #4: The US could have used a better plan. ...
  • Pro #3: The bombs saved money. ...
  • Con #3: The bombs were deployed too early. ...
  • Pro #4: The bombs made the US a superpower. ...
  • Con #2: The bombs caused a nuclear fallout. ...
  • Pro #5: The bombs saved people.

Was the atomic bomb revenge for Pearl Harbor?

For a time before the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the United States considered nuking the Japanese fleet at anchor — a kind of reverse, radioactive Pearl Harbor.

What are 3 reasons why the US used the atomic bomb on Japan?

Summary of Possible Reasons:
  • Ending the war early while minimizing casualties.
  • Justifying the expenses of the Manhattan Project (creating the bomb)
  • Simply using the bomb because it existed and to test its effects.
  • Impressing the Soviet Union.
  • A response to Pearl Harbor.
  • Forcing Japan to surrender.

Why did the Japanese not want to surrender?

With defeat imminent, Japan's leaders feared that without the imperial house, the state and their own power would be devalued and diminished in the eyes of the people, and that the state would ultimately disintegrate.

Could Japan have won ww2?

Key point: Japan could never have crushed U.S. maritime forces in the Pacific and imposed terms on Washington. That doesn't mean it couldn't have won World War II. Let's face it. Imperial Japan stood next to no chance of winning a fight to the finish against the United States.

What if Japan didn't surrender?

If Japan does not surrender, bombs will have to be dropped on her war industries and, unfortunately, thousands of civilian lives will be lost.

Why was the bombing of Japan unjustified?

Firstly, the bombings were unjustified because of the locations where the bombs were dropped. Neither cities were military or naval bases. Hiroshima was “… on a river delta and had been a fishing settlement for centuries” (Lawton) while Nagasaki was a shipbuilding city.

How did America warn Japan about the atomic bomb?

Leaflets dropped on cities in Japan warning civilians about the atomic bomb, dropped c. August 6, 1945.

What were alternatives to dropping the atomic bomb?

President Truman had four options: 1) continue conventional bombing of Japanese cities; 2) invade Japan; 3) demonstrate the bomb on an unpopulated island; or, 4) drop the bomb on an inhabited Japanese city.

How did the atomic bomb affect the world?

After six years of war the first atomic bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. More than 100,000 people were killed, and others subsequently died of radiation-induced cancers. The bombing brought the Second World War to an end.

How do the Japanese feel about Hiroshima?

The effects of Hiroshima and Nagasaki run quite deeply. One of the most profound effects is that Japan is very pacifistic and one of the few (if not the only country) that has outlawed war.